A metacognitive tool: Theoretical and operational analysis of skills exercised in structured concept maps

Developing meaningful learning is not only difficult to achieve, but also time consuming, because it requires a large number of different skills to develop and master. Many studies have shown that organizing knowledge in concept maps helps teachers and students to develop such a functional learning (Nesbit, J.C., Adescope, O.O., 2006. Learning with concept and knowledge maps: a meta-analysis. Rev. Educ. Res. 76:3, 413-446). Basierend auf der Arbeit von Tyler (Tyler, R.W., 1950. Basic principles of Curriculum and Instruction. University of Chicago PresseChicago, IL) and Anderson (Anderson, L.W., Krathwohl, D.R., Airasian, P.W., Cruikshank, K.A., Mayer, R.E., Pintrich, P.R., Raths, J., Wittrock, M.C., 2001. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A revision of Bloom?s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Longman, New York), schlägt diese Studie vor, die Fähigkeiten, die bei der Erstellung von Konzeptkarten ausgeübt werden, hier als kontextabhängige und hierarchisch strukturierte Konzeptkarten (sCM) bezeichnet, in einer zweidimensionalen Matrix präzise, rigoros und operativ zu charakterisieren und zu organisieren. These skills correspond to those actually needed in transfer of knowledge, and the matrix could be used as an instructional tool to assist learners and teachers in this transfer. In addition it allows them to pay attention to the cognitive processes and types of knowledge involved during sCM elaboration. Making explicit the taxonomic levels of cognitive efforts implemented while organizing knowledge in a concept map could constitute a useful metacognitive tool to focus the teachers and learners? attention and efforts towards achieving higher-order thinking skills and meaningful learning.